The effect of science technology society (STS) learning model on science literation in physical learning reviewed from cognitive style

  • Gede Yohanes Arygunartha Faculty of Agriculture, Warmadewa University, Indonesia
Keywords: Cognitive Learning Style, Scientific Literacy, and Science Technologi Society (STS)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is 1) to analyze differences in scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI), 2) to analyze the effect of the interaction between the learning model STM with cognitive style on scientific literacy of students, 3) Analyzing the difference differences in scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) which have a cognitive style field dependent (FD), and 4) to analyze the differences differences scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) which have a cognitive style field independent (FI). This study is a quasi-experimental design with posttest only control group design. The study population was all students of class XI MIA Denpasar Hope Christian High School in the academic year 2018/2019. Decision-class research group based random sampling technique. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and ANOVA two lanes. The results of the analysis states the following. (1) there are differences in the results of scientific literacy scores physics, among students who study learning model Science Technology Society (STM) with students learning with learning model DI (F = 79,32; p <0.05), (2) there are significant interaction between the learning model STM learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) on the scientific literacy of students (F = 76,23; p < 0.05) and. (3) there are differences in students' science literacy among the group of students who studied with STM learning model and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) students who have the cognitive style of field independent (FI), (F = 20,75; p < 0.05), (4) there differences in students' science literacy among the group of students who studied with STM learning model and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) students who have the cognitive style of field dependence (FD), (F = 15,60; p < 0.05).

References

Sisdiknas. (2003). Kurikulum 2004 SMA: Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Silabus dan Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Yager, R.E. (1996). Science/Technology/Society, As Reform in Science Education. New York: State University of New York Press.

Sudiatmika, A A I R. (2014). Pengembangan alat ukur tes literasi sains siswa SMP dalam konteks budaya bali. Laporan Penelitian. Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.

Sadia, I W. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran sains kontruktivistik. Buku Ajar. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.

Hurd, J.R. (1985). Scientific Literacy. United State of America : Prentice Hall, Inc.

Suastra, I W. (2013). Pembelajaran sains terkini: Mendekatkan siswa dengan lingkungan alamiah dan sosial budaya. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Kurniawan, E. (2010). Pengaruh Bentuk tes Formatif dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar membaca bahasa Indonesia (eksperimen di SMP Negeri 5 Depok). Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol 1 (1): 24-41.

Nazir (2003). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Montgomery, D.C. (1996). Design and analysis of experiment. Fitht edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wiersma (1990). Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Published
2018-12-11
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 155 times
PDF downloaded = 160 times