Legal Protection for Suspect on Sexual Harassment Against Children With Disabilities at The Examination Stage
Abstract
Abstract Sexual malpractice against children with disabilities in recent years is an increasing trend in quality and quantity throughout Indonesia. In that case, there is a growing issue in the community. It is that legal protection for suspects of the cases of sexual harassment against children with disabilities at the stage of examination is not optimal. This study seeks to address the issue in question by revealing the procedures of providing legal aid to perpetrators of sexual harassment against children with disabilities at the examination stage and to the impacts of such legal protection. The type of research used in the study is empirical law research. The results of data analysis indicate that: 1) procedures of providing legal aid in the form of protection to perpetrators of sexual harassment against children with disabilities are adjusted according to the provisions contained in the Criminal Procedure Code; 2) the impact of legal protection toward such perpetrators against sexual harassment is that the number of crimes decreases. Keywords: Children With Disabilities; Legal Protection; Sexual Harrasment.References
REFERENCES
Abu Daud Busrodan Au Bakar Busro. (1993). Asas-asas hukum tata Negara. Jakarta: Gholia.
Adji, O. S. (1984). KUHP sekarang. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Arnot, M., Casely-Hayford, L., & Yeboah, T. (2018). Post-colonial dilemmas in the construction of Ghanaian citizenship education: National unity, human rights and social inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development, 61(November 2017), 117–126.
Chasawi, A. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Daniel S Lev. (1995). Hukum dan Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Esteves, A. M., Factor, G., Vanclay, F., Götzmann, N., & Moreira, S. (2017). Adapting social impact assessment to address a project’s human rights impacts and risks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67(January), 73–87.
Harahap, Abdul Bazar., & Sutardi, N. (2006). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Cendekiawan Independen RI.
Harahap, M. Y. (2007). Pembahasan, permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinargrafika.
Kadir, M. A. (2004). Hukum dalam penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya.
Kaligis, O. . (2006). Perlindungan hokum atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, terdakwa dan terpidana. Bandung: alumni.
Kepolisian Negara RI. (2000). No TitleHimpunan bujuklak, bujuklap dan bujukmin Proses penyidikan Tindak Pidana. Jakarta.
Kim, G. (2018). “Why is studying hard a violation of human rights?â€: Tensions and contradictions in Korean students’ reasoning about human rights. Journal of Social Studies Research.
Lubis, M. S. (2010). Miranda Rule Hak tersangka sebelum pemeriksaan. Yogyakarta: Yustisia.
Manan, B. (2000). Arogansi MPR. Harian Republik.
Mien, B. (2003). Perlindungan HAM melalui Asas Praduga tak bersalah. Bandung: alumni.
Miller, A. M., Kismödi, E., Cottingham, J., & Gruskin, S. (2015). Sexual rights as human rights: A guide to authoritative sources and principles for applying human rights to sexuality and sexual health. Reproductive Health Matters, 23(46), 16–30.
Muladi. (2005). Hak Asasi Manusia, Hakekat konsep dan komplikasinya dalamPersepektif Hukum Mayarakat. Bandung: Refikasditama.
Mulyatno. (1996). Hukum acara Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Panjaitan, D. (2006). Panduan bantuan hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: LBH.
Paul s Bautdan Beny Herman K. (1998). Kompilasi Reklamasi Hak asasi. Jakarta: YLBH.
Qamar, N. (2013). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinargrafika.
RI, D. H. dan H. (n.d.). Jurnal HAM. Badan Penelitian dan hukum.
Sudarto. (1986). Kapita selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: alumni.
Sukanto, S. (1983). Faktor-fakttor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Persada.
Suseno, F. M. (1989). Etika Politik Prinsip-prinsip Moral dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta.: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Undang-undang No 8 tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-unang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang No 39 tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
SinarGrafika, 2001, UURI Nomor 2 tahun 2002, tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia
Undang-undang RI nomor 16 tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum.
Usfunan, J. (n.d.). Demokrasi dan Ham. Fakultas Hukum UNUD.
Usfunan, J. (2001). Pelanggaran Hak-hak asasi Manusia. Fakultas Hukum UNUD.
Vadlamannati, K. C., Janz, N., & Berntsen, Ø. I. (2018). Human Rights Shaming and FDI: Effects of the UN Human Rights Commission and Council. World Development, 104, 222–237.
van der Ploeg, L., & Vanclay, F. (2017). A tool for improving the management of social and human rights risks at project sites: The Human Rights Sphere. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4072–4084.
Wahab, Abdul., & S. (1998). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik Menuju Sistem Pelayanan yang responsive dan berkualitas. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
Waluyo, B. (2000). Pidana dan pemidanaan. Sinar grafika.
Waluyo, B. (2012). Viktimologi, perlindungan Korban dan saksi. Sinar Grafika.
Weda, D. (2008). Teori konstitusi dan Negara Hukum. Denpasar: Pascasarjana Universitas Mahendradatta.
Wigjosubroto, S. (2007). Kebutuhan Warga Masyarakat Miskin untuk memperoleh Bantuan Hukum. Jakarta.
Winarta, F. H. (2011). Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia. Elek media Komputindo.
Zulaidi. (2010). Manfaat pelaksanna Bantuan Hukum bagi tersangka/terdakwa dalam usaha mencari keadilan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Abstract viewed = 157 times
PDF downloaded = 142 times
