Application of Burden of Proof to Child Labour as Protection of Children's Rights

  • Ahmad Fauzi Faculty of Law, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • M. Noor Fajar Al Arif F Faculty of Law, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Keywords: Burden of proof, child labor, legal protection

Abstract

Child labour should be given legal protection, one form of protection for child labour is to impose a Burden of Proof (Burden of Proof) for child labour in accordance with the provisions of the ILO Convention (International Labor Organization) No. 138 of 1973 on the minimum age to be allowed to work and the ILO (International Labour Organization) Convention No. 183 then 1999 on the abolition of the worst forms of work for. This research aims to examine the philosophical foundation of the burden of proof in the Indonesian legal system and to examine the burden of proof implementation for child labour in Indonesia. This research is legal research using a normative juridical approach, the data used are primary data and secondary data analyzed using quantitative analysis. The results of the study are the first philosophical application of the principle of reverse burden of proof that has been regulated in various legal rules in Indonesia, including Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning limited Company legal No. 32 of 2009 on the protection and management of the environment and the provisions of the crime of corruption relating to the freezing, expropriation and confiscation of the perpetrators of the crime of corruption in accordance. Both countries have ratified ILO Convention No. 138 of 1973 on the Minimum age to be allowed to work and ILO Convention No. 182 of 1999 on the Prohibition and immediate action on the elimination of the worst forms of Child Labour which affirms the existence of a reverse proof for child labour.

 

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2021). International Cooperation On Combating Human Trafficking Especially Women And Children: A View from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(4), 673–692. doi:10.17304/ijil.vol1.4.562

Cooke, J. (1992). Law of Tort. London: Pitman Publishing.

Gaener, B. A. (2009). Law Dictionary. New York: West.

Hardjasoemantri, K. (1999). Strict Liability (Tanggung Jawab Mutlak), Penyidik & Negarawan, Kumpulan Karya Tulis Menghormati 70 Tahun Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. Bandung: Alumni.

Hardjasoemantri, K. (2002). Hukum Tata Lingkungan (Ketujuh). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Irawanto, Farid, M., & Anwar, J. (1999). Anak Yang Butuh Perlindungan Khusus di Indonesia, Kerja sama PKPM Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta. Jakarta: Departemen Sosial dan UNICEF.

Kantaatmadja, K. (1981). Ganti Rugi Internasional Pencemaran Minyak di Laut. Bandung: Alumni.

Khairatunnisa, & Kadir, M. Y. A. (2019). The Protection of Educational Rights for Child Labour (A Case Study of Child Labour at Horse Stable in Central Aceh, Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 3(2), 272–278. Retrieved from https://jim.usk.ac.id/kenegaraan/article/view/16132

Murray, A. J. (1961). Pedagang dan Pelacur Di Jakarta Sebagai Kajian Antropologis. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

Projodikoro, W. (1992). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur.

Samsul, I. (2004). Perlindungan Konsumen: Kemungkinan Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Mutlak. Jakarta: UI Press.

Subono, N. I. (2002). Laki-laki: Pelaku atau Korban Kekersan, Dalam (Edisi 26). Jakarta: Jurnal Perempuan Indonesia.

Suryandono, W. (2005). Jaminan Sosial. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Tahamata, L. C. O. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Anak, Kajian Ketentuan United Nations Convention On The Right Of The Child. SASI, 24(1), 40. doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i1.117

UNICEF. (2002). Laporan Situasi Anak di Dunia Tahun 1997. Jakarta: Swadaya.

Article 31:8: United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

Article 9:2 Konvensi ILO 158, tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.

Employment Act (Chapter 31), Revised Edition Singapore, 2009

International Labor of Office Geneva, Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining, Report of the Comittee of Expert Under application of Convention and Recommendation (Article 19, 22, and 35 of the Constitution)

Bahan ajar dari ILO pada pelatihan hakim hubungan indutrial di Megamendung Bogor 24-25 November 2010. Penelitian ILO ini kemudian dimuat dalam Paragrap 230, 231, dan 232 yang pada pokoknya menegaskan bahwa beban pembuktian atas alasan diskriminasi ada pada pengusaha.

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Dalam Kata Pengantar Rencana Aksi Nasional Penghapusan Eksploitasi Seksual Anak (RAN PESKA).

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat No. 411 US 792 Tahun 1973, Mc Donnel Douglas Vs Green (diskriminasi warna Kulit), Putusan Pengadilan Banding, Kamar Kelima, Argentina No. 144/05 s.d 68536 tanggal 14 Juni 2006, dalam Parra Verra Maxim Vs san Timoteo SA Conc (PHK berkaitan diskriminasi anti serikat), putusan pengadilan tinggi perburuhan, Sub Bag 1 Spesialis Perselisihan Individual dalam Sao Transporte S.A Vs Gilman Ramos Da Silva, 5 Maret 2003 (PHK berkaitan diskriminasi HIV/AIDS). Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Spanyol, Kamar Kedua, 23 November 1981, kasus 38/1981 9PHK Berkaitan dengan diskriminasi anti serikat kerja).

Putusan MA-RI No. 423k/Pdt.Sus/2012 tanggal 18 Juli 2011 dalam Yarlim Gulo Cs. Vs CV. Sinar Mulia (bukti kepersonaliaan), Putusan MA-RI No. 211 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 tanggal 19 April 2012 dalam PT. Supra Boga Lestari Vs. Ade Siswanto (PHK), Putusan MA-RI No. 408 K/Pdt.Sus/2011 tanggal 13 Juli 2011 dalam Perkara Tomy Tempati Vs. PT. Garuda Indonesia (Kebebasan Berserikat)

Principles of European Tort Law, European Group on Tort Law, (penyunting), 2005, di www.egtl.org/ principles/pdf/PETL.pdf

Ringkasan Eksekutif Dari UNICEF, Penelitian Partisipatori Terhadap Anak Yang Dilacurkan Di Surakarta Dan Indramayu, Coperazione Italiana, Tanpa Tahun

Rumusan Beban pembuktian terbalik dalam perkara PHK dimuat dalam Konvensi ILO No. 158 tentang PHK dan Survei Umum Komite Ahli, Paragraf 203, diskriminasi: Konvensi ILO 183 Tahun 2003 tentang Persalinan Pasal 8 dan Survei Umum Komite Ahli Paragraf 203. Kebebasan Berserikat: Rekomendasi No. 143 Tahun 1971 Pasal 6 Ayat (2) huruf e, Survei Umum Komite Ahli Paragraf 217, 218 dan 219 dan Survei Umum Komite Kebebasan Berserikat Paragraf 817

Survei Umum Komite Ahli ILO Penerapan Konvensi 158 dan Rekomendasi 166 Laporan III bagian 4B Sesi Konfensi: 82 Butir 40, 45 dan 47

Published
2023-03-14
How to Cite
Fauzi, A., & Arif F, M. N. F. A. (2023). Application of Burden of Proof to Child Labour as Protection of Children’s Rights. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 10(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.10.1.2022.12-19
Abstract viewed = 236 times
PDF downloaded = 191 times