Pengujian validitas konstruk berbagi pengetahuan pada tim proyek DB
Abstrak
Variabel atau konstruk berbagi pengetahuna merupakan konstruk multidimensional. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas dari indikator-indikator pembentuk konstruk berbagi pengetahuan dengan melakukan analisis faktor konfirmatori (CFA). Konstruk berbagi pengetahuan diukur dengan 2 (dua) dimensi yaitu dimensi berbagi pengetahuan diam-diam dan dimensi berbagi pengetahuan secara ekplisit, dengan 14 (empat belas) indikator yang sesuai dengan kajian teoritis. Faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap berbagi pengetahuan diam-diam dan berbagi pengetahuan secara ekplisit dianalisis berdasar data lapangan yang dikumpulkan dari penyebaran 120 kuesioner pada 40 proyek DB di beberapa kota di Indonesia. Dari hasil outer loading, dapat dilihat bahwa semua indikator konstruk valid dimana nilai t-statistics yang dihasilkan > 1.96. Kemudian dari hasil path coefficients, bahwa semua first order konstruk berpengaruh signifikan terhadap second order konstruk berbagi pengetahuan dimana nilai t-statistics yang dihasilkan untuk semua first order konstruk > 1.96. Hal ini berarti bahwa instrumen berbagi pengetahuan yang dikembangkan memiliki validitas konstruk yang baik dan memiliki koefisien reliabilitas konsistensi internal yang tinggi.
Referensi
Algeo, Chivionne G, L. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body Of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Fifth Edit). Project Management Institute, Inc.
Ary, Donald, L. C. J. dan A. R. (1982). Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan Terjemahan Arief Furchan. Usaha Nasional.
Basoka, I. W. A., & Sinarta, I. N. (2019). Kapasitas Dukung Fondasi Diatas Tanah Timbunan Sampah Sebagai Usaha Mitigasi Bencana. Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil 3.
Chinowsky, P., C. (2007). Knowledge management to learning organization connection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:3(122)
Cooke, T. (2013). Can knowledge sharing mitigate the effect of construction project complexity? Construction Innovation, 13(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171311296093
Cumming, Lar, Y, &, Don, V, Ande, W, Alle, ., (, 2004)., A, Te, S, T, O, F, T, … 390-400. (2004). A Te s t o f t h e I n f l u e n c e o f G o a l Orientation on the F eed Bac k-seeking Process. J Our Nal of A Pplied Py Colo g Y ., 182, 390–400.
Fong, P. S., & Chu, L. (2006). Exploratory Study of Knowledge Sharing in Contracting Companies : A Sociotechnical Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, September, 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1061/_ASCE0733-9364_2006132:9_928
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2014). Partial Least Squares Konsep Teknik Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 (Edisi 2). Universitas Diponegoro. https://doi.org/979.704.300.2
Janz, B.D., Colquitt, J.A. & Noe, R. . (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness : the role of autonomy, interpendence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personal Psychology, 50, 877–904.
Jarast, P., & Ghayoomi, M. (2018). Numerical Modeling of Cone Penetration Test in Unsaturated Sand inside a Calibration Chamber. Int. J. Geomech., 18(2).
Javernick-will, A., & Asce, A. M. (2012). Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Engineering and Construction Organizations : Power of Social Motivations. April, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000076.
Kanapeckiene, L., Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Seniut, M. (2010). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Integrated knowledge management model and system for construction projects. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 23(7), 1200–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.030
Kathiravelu, S. R., Mansor, N. N. A., Ramayah, T., & Idris, N. (2014). Why Organisational Culture Drives Knowledge Sharing ? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.656
Kent, D., & Becerik G, B. (2010). Understanding Construction Industry Experience and Attitudes toward Integrated Project Delivery. In Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce - J CONSTR ENG MANAGE-ASCE (Vol. 136). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188
Kim, T. T., Lee, G., Kong, H., & Lee, S. (2013). Social capital , knowledge sharing and organizational performance What structural relationship do they have in hotels ? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(5), 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-Jan-2012-0010
Kokanuch, A and Tuntrabundit, K. (2014). Knowledge Sharing Capability And Organizational Performance: A Theoretical Perspective. 10 Th International Academic Conference, ISBN 978-80-87927-02-1, IISES.
Lee, M. R., & Lan, Y. (2011). Expert Systems with Applications Toward a unified knowledge management model for SMEs. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(1), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.025
Loforte R, F. (2009). Enhancing knowledge management in construction firms. Construction Innovation, 9(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170910973493
Malone, D. (2002). Knowledge management. A model for organizational learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(02)00039-8
Matthews, O., & Howell, G. (2005). Integrated project delivery: An example of relational contracting. In Lean Construction Journal (Vol. 2).
Mo, P.-Q., Marshall, A. M., & Hai-Sui, Y. (2017). Interpretation of Cone Penetration Test Data in Layered Soils Using Cavity Expansion Analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 143(1).
Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring Social Attitudes. Teacher College, Columbia University.
Pathirage, C. P., Amaratunga, D. G., & Haigh, R. P. (2007). Tacit knowledge and organisational performance : construction industry perspective. 11(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710728277
PUPR, M. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar dan Pedoman Pengadaan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Terintegrasi Rancang Bangun Melalui Penyedia.
Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602746
Sekaran, U. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis (edisi 4). Salemba Empat.
Wang, S., and Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review., 20, 115–131.
Wang.C.J and Tsai.C.Y. (2013). Managing innovation and creativity in organizations : an empirical study of service industries in Taiwan. Empirical Article. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0201-2
Woo, J., Clayton, M. J., Johnson, R. E., Flores, B. E., & Ellis, C. (2004). Dynamic Knowledge Map : reusing experts ’ tacit knowledge in the AEC industry. 13, 203–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.09.003
Zhou, J., Li, E., Wang, M., Chen, X., Shi, X., & Jiang, L. (2019). Feasibility of Stochastic Gradient Boosting Approach for Evaluating Seismic Liquefaction Potential Based on SPT and CPT Case Histories. J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 33(3).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstrak viewed = 59 times
PDF (English) downloaded = 90 times
