AGRARIAN REFORM AT SIGI REGENCY OF CENTRAL SULAWESI: BETWEEN HOPE AND REALITY
Abstract
The determination of conservation areas without providing a solution overcoming the poverty of society has led to conflict between society and the state. Therefore, Sigi Regency Government-run programs Agrarian Reform in 2016 to reduce poverty and the rare arable land of the community in the area. This study aims to examine the implementation of Agrarian Reform in Sigi, in the perspective of law and human rights. This study applied a qualitative descriptive method by conducting interviews with informants from various sources. The results of this study indicated that there are discrepancies between the regulations and the implementation of agrarian reform in this area, considering the Perpu Number 56, 1960 about the determination of the vast farmland and Government Regulation Number 224, 1961 on the implementation of distribution of land and reparation, as implementing regulations and Presidential Decree Number 86, 2018 of Agrarian Reform. According to the rules of agrarian reform was the distribution of land to the community, as well as eliminating the inequality of land ownership and not solely land certificates. The priority of the recipient of the land was a community that has a land area of less than 0.5 hectares and extensive land in government given aim was an area of 2 hectares. The facts found in Sigi Regency were a free certification for people who already have the land instead of the distribution of land to the people in accordance with the Agrarian Reform, so the programs were conducted in Sigi was not the Agrarian Reform.
References
Bernstein, H., Byress, T. J., Borras, S., & Kay, C. (2008). Kebangkitan Studi Reforma Agraria di Abad 21. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Ismail, F. K. (2013). Pendayagunaan Tanah Negara Bekas Tanah Terlantar Melalui Program Reformasi Agraria. Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 121–134. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/360
Rumboko, L., Race, D., & Curtis, A. (2013). Optimising Community-Based Forest Management Policy In Indonesia: A Critical Review. JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(3), 250–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10906
Santoso, U. (2012). Hukum Agraria: kajian Komprehensif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sihaloho, M., & Purwandari, H. (2009). Reforma Agraria Di Bidang Pertanian : Studi Kasus Perubahan Struktur Agraria dan Diferensiasi Kesejahteraan Komunitas Pekebun di Lebak, Banten. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v3i1.5874
Sihaloho, M., Purwandari, H., & Mardiyaningsih, D. I. (2010). Reforma Agraria Dan Revitalisasi Pertanian Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Pertanian Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura di Jawa Barat. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i1.5849
Sokoastri, V., & Soetarto, E. (2014). Dampak Reforma Agraria Dari Bawah Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Desa Garongan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v6i3.8023
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria
Undang-undang Nomor 41 tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan
Keputusan Presiden No. 86 Tahun 2018 tentang Reforma Agraria.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 88 tahun 2017 tentang Penyelesaian penguasaan tanah dalam kawasan hutan.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 104 tahun 2015 tentang Tata cara perubahan peruntukan dan fungsi kawasan hutan
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan rencana pengelolaan hutan serta pemanfaatan hutan.
Pedoman Identifikasi, Verifikasi, dan Penetapan Tanah Objek Reforma Agraria dan areal Perhutanan Sosial di Tingkat kabupaten
Copyright (c) 2021 NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 101 times
PDF downloaded = 155 times
