ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PENGUKURAN PENCIPTAAN NILAI PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN: PENDEKATAN BOBOT ENTROPI DAN METODE PENJUMLAHAN

Authors

  • Sarita Vania Clarissa
  • Dewi Puji Rahayu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.18.1.2026.31-40

Keywords:

These findings suggest that entropy-based measurement is more appropriate for capturing stakeholder value creation compared to the traditional summation method.

Abstract

Stakeholder value creation has become an essential concept in evaluating corporate sustainability and performance. However, discrepancies remain in measuring stakeholder value, particularly between traditional aggregation methods and more advanced weighting techniques. This study aims to compare stakeholder value creation measurement using the entropy weighting method (Xu et al., 2023) and the summation approach (Signori et al., 2021). The study employs a quantitative approach with paired sample t-test analysis to examine the differences between the two measurement methods. The results show a significant difference (p-value < 0.05) between the two approaches, indicating that the entropy method provides a more accurate and consistent representation of stakeholder value distribution. The entropy method demonstrates lower standard deviation, reflecting better data homogeneity and precision. These findings suggest that entropy-based measurement is more appropriate for capturing stakeholder value creation compared to the traditional summation method.

References

Adesanmi, T. 2022. Environmental Accounting Practices and Stakeholder Value of Selected Listed Companies in Nigeria. The International Journal of Business & Management, 10(8).

Anifowose, M., Abang, S., & Zakari, M. A. (2020). Integrated capitals reporting and companies’ sustainable value: Evidence from the Asian continent. Asian Review of Accounting, 28(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-10-2019-0184

Chung, R., Bayne, L., & Birt, J. (2023). The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(1), 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2022-0165

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS (Edisi terbaru). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2021). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(1), 1–22.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Kurniawan. (2019). Metode statistik untuk penelitian. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. (2022). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 1–42.

Rastogi, S., Singh, K., & Kanoujiya, J. (2024). Firm value and ESG: The moderating role of ownership concentration and corporate disclosures. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-10-2022-0266

Signori, S., San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Rusconi, G. (2021). Stakeholder value creation: Comparing ESG and value added in European companies. Sustainability, 13(3), 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031392

Soetanto, T. V., & Agustia, D. (2025). Financial statement comparability and cash holding: Moderated by ESG performance. Asian Review of Accounting, 33(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2023-0354

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Xu, X., et al. (2023). Stakeholder value measurement using entropy method. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2023.xxxxxx

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Sarita Vania Clarissa, & Dewi Puji Rahayu. (2026). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PENGUKURAN PENCIPTAAN NILAI PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN: PENDEKATAN BOBOT ENTROPI DAN METODE PENJUMLAHAN. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 18(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.18.1.2026.31-40