“THE DECISION USEFULNESS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE INVESTORS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY”

Authors

  • Made Sudarma
  • Putu Wulandari Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.16.2.2025.386-402

Keywords:

decision usefulness, investor decision making, accounting information, phenomenology

Abstract

The decision usefulness of accounting information becomes important when financial statements and the information in them are used as a basis for decision making by investors in the capital market. Providing useful and high-quality information about economic units is the main objective of financial reporting. The quality of financial statements is described as decision usefulness for users of accounting information in financial statements. There is a gap between what is regulated by regulators in defining accounting information that is useful to stakeholders and the reality of how investors make investment decisions based on information in financial statements. It is important to investigate whether accounting information in financial statements is still used as the basis for investor decision making by understanding the decision usefulness of accounting information from the investor's perspective. The transcendental phenomenological approach and interpretive paradigm are used in this study to deeply understand how investors interpret the usefulness of accounting information decisions in decision making through experience as the most basic awareness. The results showed that investors interpret the usefulness of accounting information decisions based on the accuracy of representation where accounting information will be useful if the financial statements are prepared in an integrated manner and are strongly influenced by the type of investor. While the usefulness of accounting information from qualitative characteristics is relevant, investors interpret it as useful information if there is information leakage and the existence of accounting manipulation or distortion.

References

Azar, N., Zakaria, Z., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2019). The quality of accounting information: relevance or valuerelevance? Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 12(1), 1–21.
Beuving, J., & de Vries, G. (2019). Doing Qualitative Research. In Doing Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt130h8g7
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms. In Heinemann.
Chabrak, N., Haslam, J., & Oakes, H. (2019). What is accounting? The “being” and “be-ings” of the accounting phenomenon and its critical appreciation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1414–1436. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3097
Chandra, A. (2008). DECISION-MAKING IN THE STOCK MARKET?: INCORPORATING PSYCHOLOGY WITH FINANCE. National Conference on Forecasting Finanacial Markets of India.
Creswell, J. (2007). Creswell , J . W . ( 2007 ). Qualitative inquiry and research design?: Choosing among five approaches ( 2 " ’ ’ Edition ). Thousand Oaks?: Sage . Qualitative Inquiry.
Denzin, N. K. (2015). Interpretive Methods: Micromethods. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 648–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44035-3
Ehrich, L. (2005). Revisiting Phenomenology: Its potential for management research. British Academy of Management Conference Proceedings 2005: Challenges of Organizations in Global Markets.
Fishman, D. B. (1995). Postmodernism comes to program evaluation II: A review of Denzin and Lincoln’s Handbook of qualitative research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7189(95)00023-2
Kamps, J., & Kleinberg, B. (2018). To the moon: defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps. Crime Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0093-5
Weygandt, J. J., Warfield, T. D., Kieso, D. E. (2017). Intermediate Accounting. United States: Wiley.
Latief, N. F., & Niu, F. A. L. (2020). Accounting Information and Psychological Factors in Capital Market?: Do these Affect the Investors’ Decisions to Invest? Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 335. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v10i2.12931
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). In PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Pearson Education.
SOYINKA, K. A., FAGBAYIMU, M. O., ADEGOROYE, E., & OGUNMOLA, J. O. (2017). Decision Usefulness and Financial Reporting: The General Public Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v7-i4/3470
Williams, P. F. (2015). Rethingking Desicion Usefulness. Contemporary Accounting Research. 1–59.

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Sudarma, M., & Wulandari, P. (2025). “THE DECISION USEFULNESS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE INVESTORS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY”. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 16(2), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.16.2.2025.386-402

Most read articles by the same author(s)