EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIATION AS A TYPOLOGY OF CIVIL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (ADR) AT DISTRICT COURT OF BALI
Abstract
Mediation has been a typology of civil dispute settlement through negotiation process to obtain agreement from the parties assisted by mediator. The Court implements mediation which is a process of civil disputes settlement that must be taken as an instrument to fulfill the four purposes of the Supreme Court, such as addressing the problem of the accumulation of cases; faster and cheaper dispute resolution; expanding access for the parties to a sense of justice; and strengthening and maximizing the function of the courts in dispute settlement. The focus of this study lies in the investigation of the extent to which effective mediation is applied as an alternative of civil disputes settlement at the District Court of Bali. The method used is empirical law research method. The nature of this research is descriptive. There are two types of data, namely primary data and secondary data with the location of research is the District Court in Bali Province. Data collection was done by using interview techniques; Data processing and analysis were carried out by applying qualitative data analysis method. The result of the research shows that the implementation of mediation in the District Court in Bali has been in accordance with the legislation and has been capable of decomposing cases. However, obstacles in the implemention are still other significant problems that need concern of resolution. The obstacles are those relating to legal substance, legal structure and legal culture.References
Book
Ade Maman Suherman, 2008, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Ade Saptomo, 2010, Hukum Dan Kearifan Lokal (Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Nusantara), PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta.
C.F.G. Sunaryati Hartono, 1988, Hukum Ekonomi Pembangunan Indonesia, Binacipta, Bandung.
Harahap M. Yahya, 2005, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilanâ€, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Lalu Husni, 2004, Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Pengadilan dan Di Luar Pengadilan, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Lawrance M. Friedman, 1984, Amerin Law: An invaluable guide to the many faces of the law, and how it affects our daily our daily lives, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
Lorna Gilmour, Penny Hand, Cormac McKeown, 2007, Colllins English Dictionary and Thesaurus, Third Edition, , Harper Collins Publishers, Great Britain.
Maria S. W. Sumarjono, Nurhasan Ismaildan Isharyant, 2008, Mediasi Sengketa Tanah, Potensi penerapan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR) di Bidang Pertanahan, Kompas, Jakarta.
Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional, Bina Cipta, Bandung.
Nasution, 2007, Metode Riserch, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Satjipto Raharjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1989, Kegunaan Sosiologi Hukum Bagi Kalangan Hukum, cet. V. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soerjono Soekanto, 2007, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1993, Bab-bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Takdir Rahmadi, 2010, Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Takdir Rahmadi, et all, 2008, “Buku Komentar Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI N0. 1 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilanâ€, Mahkamah Agung RI, Japan International Cooperation Agency/JICA dan Indonesian Institute for Conflict Transformation/IICT, Jakarta.
Timothy Lindsey dalam Syahrizal Abbas, 2009, Mediasi Dalam Pespektif Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Articles
Andrew, J. S. (2001). Making or breaking alternative dispute resolution ? Factors influencing its success in waste management conflicts, 21.
Cheung, S. (1999). Critical factors a € ecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction, 17(3), 189–194.
Dhiaulhaq, A., Bruyn, T. De, & Gritten, D. (2014). ScienceDirect The use and effectiveness of mediation in forest and land conflict transformation in Southeast Asia : Case studies from Cambodia , Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science and Policy, 45, 132–145.
Fan, H., & Li, H. (2013). Automation in Construction Retrieving similar cases for alternative dispute resolution in construction accidents using text mining techniques. Automation in Construction, 34, 85–91.
Matsumoto, S. (2011). A duration analysis of environmental alternative dispute resolution in Japan. Ecological Economics, 70(4), 659–666.
Menkel-meadow, C. J. (2015). Mediation , Arbitration , and Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ). International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition, Vol. 15). Elsevier.
Qu, Y., & Cheung, S. O. (2012). Automation in Construction Logrolling “ win – win †settlement in construction dispute mediation. Automation in Construction, 24, 61–71.
Rose, M., & Suf, R. (2001). Alternative dispute resolution and the protection of natural areas in Ontario , Canada, 56, 1–9.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstract viewed = 194 times
PDF downloaded = 262 times
