Perlindungan Hukum Hak Pemegang Saham Dalam Pembubaran Perusahaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1618 K/PDT/2016)
Abstract
The dissolution of a limited liability company is regulated in Article 142-146 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/Pdt/2016 where one of the requirements for the application for the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company is to notify the tax agency that the company has been inactive for 3 (three) years or more which must be carried out by the Board of Directors. Whereas in the case of the dissolution of the company through a court order in article 146 paragraph 1 letter c it states that the district court may dissolve the company at the request of the shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Board of Commissioners based on the reasons that the company is not possible to continue. The formulation of the problem in this study is first, how is legal certainty to shareholders, due to the lack of clarity on who is entitled to apply for the dissolution of a limited liability company (case study of the Supreme Court's decision number 1618 k/pdt/2016, secondly, how is the legal protection for shareholders, in the case of dissolution of the company). the company in particular regarding the parties entitled to apply for the dissolution of the limited liability company (case study of the Supreme Court's decision number 1618 k/pdt/2016). In this study using a normative legal research method, namely by studying literature. The results of the study concluded that to truly guarantee legal certainty in To protect the rights of shareholders as a result of the dissolution of a company, a law, in addition to meeting formal requirements, must also meet other requirements, namely clear in its formulation, consistent in its formulation both internally and externally, use of appropriate language and easy to understand by people who read it. anya. Legal protection for shareholders, in the dissolution of the company, especially regarding the parties entitled to apply for the dissolution of the limited liability company (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/Pdt/2016) that the losses suffered by shareholders are very large losses which have implications for the development of the decision sector. The decision must provide legal protection to the shareholders. The law is made by the ruler and there is an order that must be obeyed, the judge must comply with the regulations that have been made by the authorities through laws and regulations which specifically in this case are subject to Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies.
References
Ali, A. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Penerbit Toko Gunung Agung
Ali, Z. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Edisi 1 Cetakan ke-4. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Arinanto, S. (2009). Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Pancasila, dalam Agus Wahyudi (Ed.), Tim Penyusun Buku Proceding Kongres Pancasila dalam Berbagai Perspektif. Jakarta: Sekretarit Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi
Ashshofa, B. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Hadjon, P. M. (1987) Perlindungan Rakyat Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara). Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu
Harahap, M. Y. (2011). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Kamsil. (2009). Seluk beluk perseroan terbatas menurut undang-undang No 40 Tahun 2007. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Kansil., et al. (2009). Kamus Istilah Hukum. Jakarta
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana
Mertokusumo, S. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu
Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. B. W. (2003). Hukum Sebagai Suatu System. Bandung: Remaja Rusdakarya
Pasal 1 huruf b Undang-Undang Nomor 3 tahun 1992 tentang Wajib Daftar Perusahaan
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Rasjidi, L., & Sidharta, B. A. (1994). Filsafat Hukum Madzab dan Refleksi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo
Setiono. (2004). Rule of Law (Supremasi Hukum). Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Simanjuntak, R. (2003). Beberapa Catatan yang Perlu Mendapat Perhatian dari Draft Revisi UU No. 2/1992 Tentang Usaha Perasuransian. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis. 22(2).
Soekanto, S., & Mumadji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Sunggono, B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Syahrani, R. (1999). Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti
Undang – Undang No 40 Tahun 2007.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstract viewed = 732 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 1913 times
