Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia dan Implikasi Pedagogisnya
Abstract
This study aims to discuss the pedagogical and pastoral implications of the application of the death penalty in Indonesia. This study uses a literature study method by presenting a discussion of the issue of the imposition of the death penalty in Indonesia and its implications for pedagogical activities. Anasilis results show that the application of the death penalty is contrary to human rights, specifically the right to life. Capital punishment authorizes external parties and human institutions to negate or revoke a person's right to life. It betrays the inherent and inseparable nature of the right to life of a human being. The right to life is accepted since a person becomes a human. So when the death penalty is applied in Indonesia, there is a perception that the government or state seems to legalize acts of violence against human rights. Such a perception can justify every act of violation of human rights of everyone. Consequently, the state is responsible for eliminating such perceptions by protecting Indonesian children from mistaken or wrongful understanding of human rights as a result of the imposition of the death penalty. For this reason, the government needs to encourage and develop proper human rights education in schools, namely education that enables students to have a correct understanding of human rights and capital punishment, love human rights values, and behave according to human rights values. Such education should be based on freedom, equality, democracy and tolerance in pluralism.
References
Ahmad, T. Z. (2012). Hukuman Mati terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Perspektif Fikih Jinayah. In Right: Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 1(2), 343–368. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/inright/article/view/1223
Asnawi, H. S. (2012). Hak Asasi Manusia Islam dan Barat: Studi Kritik Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukuman Mati. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 1(1), 25–48. Retrieved from https://www.aifis-digilib.com/uploads/1/3/4/6/13465004/02._ham_islam_dan_barat_habib_shulton_asnawi.pdf
Berman, P. S., & Sarat, A. (2002). The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment: Surveying the Benefits of a Cultural Analysis of Law. Columbia Law Review, 102(4), 1129. doi:10.2307/1123652
Brace, P., & Boyea, B. D. (2008). State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 360–372. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25193818
Cochran, J. K., & Chamlin, M. B. (2006). The Enduring Racial Divide In Death Penalty Support. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1), 85–99. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.11.007
Freire, P. (2007). Politik Pendidikan: Kebudayaan, Kekuasaan dan Pembebasan (Penerjemah Agung Prihantoro dan Fuad Arif Fudiyartanto). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hamzah, A. (1993). Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Pradnia Paramita.
Hamzah, A., & Sumangelipui, A. (1985). Pidana Mati di Indonesia: di Masa Llalu, Kini dan di Masa Depan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Handayani, F. (2016). Pidana Mati ditinjau dari Perspektif Teori Hukum dan Kaitannya dengan Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Pekanbaru dan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru). Jurnal Hukum Islam, 16(1), 47–70. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/hi.v16i1.2690
Hood, R. (2002). The Death Penalthy: A Worldwide Perspective (Third Edit). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2002). The Political Sociology of the Death Penalty: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 109. doi:10.2307/3088936
Lon, Y. S. (2017). Pendidikan HAM, Gender dan Antikorupsi. Ruteng: STKIP Santu Paulus.
Lon, Y. S. (2019). Membangun Manusia Seutuhnya: Perspektif Agama, Kebudayaan dan Pendidikan. Ruteng: Unika Santu Paulus.
Lubis, T. M. (2009). Kontroversi Hukuman Mati: Perbedaan Pendapat Hakim Konstitusi. Jakarta: Kompas Media Group.
Mandery, J. E. (2005). Capital Punishment: A Balance Examination. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc.
Nahei, I., dkk. (2016). Kematian Berulang: Perjuangan Perempuan Pekerja Migran Terpidana Mati dan Keluarganya Merebut Hak Hidup. Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan.
Neneng, Y. K. (2009). Analisis Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss Terhadap Kisah Pedagang dan Jin Dalam Dongeng Seribu Satu Malam. AdabiyyÄt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 8(2), 305. doi:10.14421/ajbs.2009.08206
Paredes, J. A. (2011). Some Anthropological Observations on Capital Punishment in the USA. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 17(1–2), 219–227. doi:10.1080/01924036.1993.9689018
Prakoso, D. (1987). Masalah Pidana Mati. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Rahayu, A., & Dewantara, A. (2018). Studi Kasus Eksekusi mati TKI Indonesia (Tuti Tursilawati) ditinjau dari Teori Tindakan Manusia, Tatanan Moral Subjektif dan tatanan Moral Objektif. Univeritas Katolik Widya Mandala Madiun. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/zrqvk
Reid, A. (1992). Asia Tenggara Dalam Kurun Niaga 1450-1680 Jilid I: Negara di Bawah Angin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Robet, R., & Lubis, T. M. (2016). Politik Hukuman Mati di Indonesia. Serpong: CV. Marjin Kiri.
Siswanto, A. (2009). Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Refleksi Hukum, 7–20. Retrieved from https://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/443
Stack, S. (2003). Authoritarianism and Support for the Death Penalty: A Multivariate Analysis. Sociological Focus, 36(4), 333–352. doi:10.1080/00380237.2003.10571228
Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009). Are Adolescents Less Mature Than Adults?: Minors’ Access to Abortion, The Juvenile Death Penalty, and The Alleged APA ‘Flip-Flop.’ American Psychologist, 64(7), 583–594. doi:10.1037/a0014763
Warih, A. (2015). Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. E-Journal Widya Yustisia, 1(2). Retrieved from https://e-journal.jurwidyakop3.com/index.php/yustisia/article/view/208
Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Reyna, C. (1997). An Attributional Examination of Retributive Versus Utilitarian Philosophies of Punishment. Social Justice Research, 10(4), 431–452. doi:10.1007/BF02683293
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstract viewed = 2798 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 15413 times
