Tanggung Jawab PDAM Kabupaten Gianyar dalam Hal Tidak Mengalirnya Air Secara Sepihak Kepada Konsumen dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 T Ahun 1999

Komang Adika Bayu Mahendra; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

doi:10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3431.302-307

Komang Adika Bayu Mahendra
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali, Indonesia
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3431.302-307

Abstract

Water is the most important thing in household and industry. The problem that often occurs in the community regarding water is the non-flow of water, the negligence of PDAM officers, where the consumer is the most at risk of experiencing losses. This study aims to examine the sanctions imposed on PDAM Gianyar Regency for consumer losses for the act of not draining water unilaterally and analyzing legal protection for consumers due to losses for not flowing water unilaterally. The method used is the research is normative law with legislation and conceptual approach. Sources of data are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, this data was obtained through interviews and literature study. Furthermore, the data is processed and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. The results of the study indicate that consumer protection is regulated in Law number 8 of 1999. The responsibility of the PDAM if they receive complaints from consumers, namely the PDAM technician directly goes to the consumer's area to check the cause and point of the problem so that water in the area or consumer's house does not flow. So that the PDAM can quickly deal with it. Legal remedies taken by business actors or PDAMs if there is a dispute, the PDAM prioritizes non-litigation by means of negotiation and mediation by deliberation so as to obtain a joint decision.

References

Emerson, J. (2001). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi dan Arbitrasi. Gramedia Pustaka. Jakarta.

Hanito, R. (1984). Hukum dan Masalah Penyelesaian Konflik. Majalah Fakultas Hukum UNDIP. Semarang.

Kaunang, C. D., Kawet, L., & Halim, F. (2015). Pengembangan Sistem Penyediaan Air Bersih di Desa Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 3(6), 361â€“372.

Kristiyani, C. T. S. (2011). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Lestari, D. T. B., & Suprapto, H. (2017). Analisis Pemanfaatan Mata Air Sebagai Sumber Air Baku. Jurnal Desain Konstruksi, 16(2), 151â€“164.

Miru, A. (2011). Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2014). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Novita, H. S., & Ritonga, M. K. (2018). Pelaksanaan Hak dan Kewajiban Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Berlangganan Air Bersih Antara PDAM Tirta Bina Labuhanbatu Rantauprapat Dengan Konsumen Menurut Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Civic, 2(1), 37â€“46.

Nugroho, S. A. (2008). Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau dari Hukum Acara serta Kehendak lmplernentasinya. Kencana. Jakarta.

Sinaga, T. A. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen air Minum atas Layanan PDAM Tirta Siak Kota Pekanbaru Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, 3(2), 1â€“15.