Gender Representation in English Learning Materials Textbook at the Eight Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori in 2024/2025

  • Yarnita Zega Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakults Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, (Universitas Nias)
  • Yaredi Waruwu Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakults Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, (Universitas Nias)
  • Adieli Laoli Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakults Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, (Universitas Nias)
  • Elwin Piarawan Zebua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakults Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, (Universitas Nias)
Keywords: Gender Representation, Textbooks, Gender Stereotypes, Gender Bias

Abstract

Gender is a concept that refers to the roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes deemed appropriate for men and women within a particular culture or society. Gender socialization has traditionally been carried out by spreading messages, discourses, values, norms, beliefs, and models that represent specific gender representations. Textbooks are one of the tools for cultural socialization, including the concept of gender. If textbooks address gender issues without further understanding, it can confuse students. The aim of this research is to analyze how gender is represented in textbooks, the existence of gender representation inequality, and to determine whether the textbook used still contains gender stereotypes or gender bias. This research uses a qualitative method with a content analysis approach. The subject of this study is the English textbook titled Bright an English Course for SMP/MTs Grade VIII, authored by Nur Zaida. Data analysis techniques are based on six aspects from Logsdon’s framework. The results of this study show gender inequality in the analyzed textbook, particularly in the aspect of Patterns of Mentioning Female/Male Names. Female names were mentioned only 3 times, contributing 23% of the total mentions, whereas male names were mentioned 10 times, contributing 77%. Therefore, there is a clear difference in the number of mentions between females and males, with males being much more frequently mentioned. The 54% difference indicates a significant imbalance in gender representation in the context of name mentions.

References

Afandi, (2019). Bentuk-Bentuk Perilaku Bias Gender. Major Islamic Comunity Development. Faculty Da'wa and Community. Universitas Islam Negeri Surabaya. LENTERA: Journal of Gender and Children Studies. E-ISSN - P-ISSN. Volume 1 Issue 1.

Ahmad, and Shah (2019). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender Representations in the Content of 5th Grade English Language Textbook. Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, ISSN: 2014-3680 8(1). 1-24. http://rimcis.hipatiapress.com

Apsari, Hidayat, Husna, & Alek. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis on “Bright: An English” Textbook: Gender Equity in a Popular EFL School Textbook in Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies. ISSN (Online) 2684-9224, ISSN (Print): 2684-7620. Vol. 4, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i2.9549

Bachore. (2022). Analysis of Gender Representation in English Language Learning Materials: The Case of Grade Ten Textbook in Ethiopia. Department of English Language and Literature, Hawassa University, Ethiopia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. ISSN 1927-2677. E-ISSN 1927-268. Vol. 11, No. 5. http://jct.sciedupress.com

Binasdevi, and Abdurahman. (2021). Ketidaksetaraan Gender Dalam Buku Tematik Kurikulum 2013 Perspektif Semiotika Pierce. Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak LP2M IAIN. Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia. Equalita, Vol. 3 http://syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/equalita/article/view/8738

Brussino, and McBrien(2022). Gender stereotypes in education: Policies and practices to address gender stereotyping across OECD education systems. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/a46ae056-en

Cahyani, and Perdana (2019). Textbooks evaluation by Ur’s theory. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy. http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/ELP

Dahmardeh and Kim (2020) An analysis of the representation of cultural content in English coursebooks. Journal of applied researcher and higher education. DOI:10.1108/JARHE-09-2020-0290

Fahrianny, Alex, and Wekke. (2019). Gender Representation in English Textbooks for Islamic Junior High School Students. Kafa’ah Journal. (Print ISSN 2356-0894 Online ISSN 2356-0630) Available online at: http://kafaah.org/index.php/kafaah/index

Hidayat, and Abdillah. (2019). Ilmu Pendidikan “Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasinya. Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia (LPPPI). ISBN:978-623-90653-8-6.

Laoli, et al. (2023). Gender differences in college students’ achievement in teaching English as a foreign language using inquiry-based learning. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. Vol. 10, No. 4, 666-673, 2023. ISSN(E) 2410-9991 / ISSN(P) 2518-0169.

Muzdalifah, Noorman, and Gunawan. (2021). Gender Representation in English Textbook: A Visual Grammar Analysis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. e-ISSN: 2541-4135| p-ISSN: 1412-565 X. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i3.43093

Shallaita, Nawawi and Amin. (2021). Analysis of English Language Teaching Materials on Gender Representation. Mataram University, Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU), ISSN 2364-5369. Vol. 8. Issue 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2423.

Published
2024-11-27
How to Cite
Yarnita Zega, Yaredi Waruwu, Adieli Laoli, & Elwin Piarawan Zebua. (2024). Gender Representation in English Learning Materials Textbook at the Eight Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori in 2024/2025. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(3), 956-965. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.10.3.10852.956-965
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF downloaded = 0 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)