Vibration Modeling and Simulation of Braced and Unbraced Steel Structure
Abstract
Repeated dynamic loads on multiple stories structure may cause damage in the midst of natural disaster, such as earthquakes and landslides, hence it is necessary to observe how the response occurs. Therefore, this paper studies the performance of two-story steel frame without braces and with inverted V concentric braces. Both frames were given a static and a dynamic load in the form of a sinusoidal load for 2 seconds in the form of forced harmonic vibration. After the dynamic load is turned off, harmonic free vibration applies. Vibration is given to the weakest orthogonal axis on the frame with a frequency of 0,5 Hz; 1,03 Hz; 1.7 Hz. To reduce the deviation between stories that occur due to dynamic loads, bracing is provided as a stiffening element. The test variations are called models 1, 2 and 3 with model 1 unbraced frame and model 2 braced frame with the same load between floors, while model 3 unbraced frame model with weight 2nd floor is 3 times larger than 1st floor. It found that the braced frame has a minimum drift and its drift is enhanced with the increase of load capacity.
References
F. Stochino and G. Carta, “SDOF models for reinforced concrete beams under impulsive loads accounting for strain rate effects,†Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 276, pp. 74–86, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.05.022.
A. Tahmasebi and M. Rahimi, “Evaluation of nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of steel braced frame buildings subjected to near-field earthquakes using FBD and DBD,†Structures, vol. 34, no. July, pp. 1364–1372, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.082.
I. P. E. Sarassantika and H. L. Hsu, “Improving brace member seismic performance with amplified-deformation lever-armed dampers,†J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 192, no. August 2021, p. 107221, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107221.
P. Saingam, R. Matsuzaki, K. Nishikawa, B. Sitler, Y. Terazawa, and T. Takeuchi, “Experimental dynamic characterization of friction brace dampers and application to the seismic retrofit of RC buildings,†Eng. Struct., vol. 242, no. May, p. 112545, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112545.
I. P. E. Sarassantika and H. L. Hsu, “Upgrading framed structure seismic performance using steel Lever-Armed dampers in the Braces,†Eng. Struct., vol. 280, no. January, p. 115683, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115683.
R. Sulaksitaningrum et al., “The optimal damper placement configuration for three-dimensional RC building,†IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 669, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012056.
S. N. Fathima and S. Road, “A Study on Tuned Mass Dampers on 10 Storey RC Framed Structures Using SAP-2000 Software,†pp. 59–65, 2022.
A. A. Abbas and D. M. Cotsovos, “Numerical investigation of the behaviour of RC wide beams under impact loads,†COMPDYN 2015 - 5th ECCOMAS Themat. Conf. Comput. Methods Struct. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., no. May 2017, pp. 2904–2914, 2015, doi: 10.7712/120115.3586.1135.
X. Chong, Y. F. Guo, J. Q. Huang, Q. Jiang, M. Zhao, and J. G. Dai, “Seismic performance of a steel frame structure with dissipative cladding connections,†J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 197, no. October, pp. 9–11, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107508.
B. Fernandus and I. P. E. Sarassantika, “Reducing the torsional behavior in irregular special moment resisting frames with steel dampers,†vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–74, 2022.
B. Fu, Y. Gao, and W. Wang, “Dual generative adversarial networks for automated component layout design of steel frame-brace structures,†Autom. Constr., vol. 146, no. February, pp. 10–12, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104661.
Z. Li, F. Chen, M. He, W. Long, J. Ou, and M. Li, “Experimental Investigation on Self-Centering Steel-Timber Hybrid Beam-Column Connections,†J. Struct. Eng., vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.1061/jsendh.steng-11570.
S. Zheng, X. Zhang, and X. Zhao, “Experimental investigation on seismic performance of corroded steel columns in offshore atmospheric environment,†Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tal.1580.
Abstract viewed = 136 times
PDF downloaded = 114 times
