Juridicial Review of Corruption Crimes for Forgery of Bussiness License (Supreme Court Decision Number 44/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PN.SBY)

Manro Manrie Sipayung

doi:10.55637/elg.6.1.11026.156-163

Manro Manrie Sipayung Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Hukum Universitas Prima Medan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.6.1.11026.156-163

Keywords: Alcoholic Beverage Business Licenses, Corruption Crimes, Gratuities.

Abstract

This research discusses the Corruption Crime case involving counterfeiting of alcoholic beverage business permits at the Surabaya District Court Number 44 /Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Sby. This research uses a normative juridical and descriptive qualitative approach to analyze related legal norms and their legal and sociological impacts. The main data was obtained from the Surabaya District Court decision and related legal regulations, while the secondary data was from legal literature and other documents. The findings of the research show that the crime of corruption is a crime against humanity which is classified as an extraordinary crime (extra ordinary crimes) where according to the author the most appropriate punishment for corruptors is extraordinary punishment (extra ordinary law). However, the judge's decision in trying the defendant was very low, one of which was the decision that the author analyzed, namely a prison sentence of 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months, with a fine of IDR 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah) subsidiary 6 (six) Months of Confinement. The author conveys to improve law enforcement, the capacity of legal officers, and openness in the legal process.

References

Adawiyah, R., Prasetyo, M. A., Ayu, H., Sitanggang, D., Novianty, J., Timoteus, N., & Andreas, M. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pembuktian Kebenaran Dasar Terhadap Penguasaan Tanah. Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(3), 103. Https://Doi.Org/10.46930/Ojsuda.V31i3.3349

Alam, S. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Praktek Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 5(2), 157. Https://Doi.Org/10.31000/Jhr.V5i2.924

Ali, M. (2016). Hukum Pidana Korupsi . Uii Press .

Anjari, W. (2023). Penerapan Pemberatan Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(2), 263. Https://Doi.Org/10.29123/Jy.V15i2.507

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. (1998). Metode Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Berutu, S. P., & Rumapea, M. S. (2023). Juridical Review Of Criminal Acts Of Environmental Destruction That Occurred In The Tele Forest, Samosir Reg Ency. Legal Brief, 11(6), 3563–3573. Https://Doi.Org/10.35335/Legal.V11i6.632

Djaja, E. (2010). Tipologi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Elisabeth, D. M., & Simanjuntak, W. A. (2020). Analisis Review Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Fraud). Methosika: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist, 4(1), 9–18. Https://Doi.Org/10.46880/Jsika.Vol4no1.Pp9-18

Hadi, S. (1986). Metodologi Research, Jilif 1. Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi Ugm.

Hamzah, A. (1984). Korupsi Di Indonesia?: Masalah Dan Pemecahannya. Gramedia.

Hamzah, A. (1991). Asas-Asas. Jakarta Rineka Cipta.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Riwukore, J. R. (2022). Pelatihan Penyusunan Konsep Strategi Pencegahan Korupsi Berbasis Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Asn Pemerintah Kota Kupang. Sasambo: Jurnal Abdimas (Journal Of Community Service), 4(4), 648–672. Https://Doi.Org/10.36312/Sasambo.V4i4.910

Rusli, T. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Universitas Bandar Lampung (Ubl) Press.

Saputra, I., Ismail, I., & Aminah, S. (2021). Evaluasi Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara (Asn) Pada Sekretariat Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten Wajo Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan. Jurnal Ada Na Gau: Public Administration.

Setiawan, I. (2016). Mengikis Perilaku Korupsi Pada Birokrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 42(1), 29. Https://Doi.Org/10.33701/Jipwp.V42i1.140

Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali.